Keyword summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Happy Sad Confused Podcast results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 279 hits . Analysis detected 2,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,347 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,121 of 37,536 keywords). This Happy Sad Confused Podcast is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Happy Sad Confused Podcast
Keyword details
Total words: 1,347
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.7% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst