Keyword summary
98%1 analyzed article/video449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Happy Sad Confused Podcast results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 2,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,347 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,121 of 37,536 keywords). This Happy Sad Confused Podcast is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Happy Sad Confused Podcast
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,347
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 12.7%12.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos