Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hanwha Defense results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 791 hits. Analysis detected 4,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,864 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,929 of 37,536 keywords). This Hanwha Defense is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Hanwha Defense
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%Hanwha Defense (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,864
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.2%7.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Keyword 27.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos