Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamster results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 190 hits . Analysis detected 1,155 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,284 of 37,536 keywords). This Hamster is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Hamster
Keyword details
Total words: 1,316
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst