Keyword summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamas War results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Sunk Cost Effect, Recency Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 2,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,206 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (34,803 of 37,536 keywords). This Hamas War is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Hamas War
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠8%Hamas War (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,206
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751007.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos