Keyword summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gull results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 700 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ā 43% (21,741 of 37,536 keywords). This Gull is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Gull
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
ā 0%Lieutenant Governor1%
ā 0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
ā 0%Texas Supreme Court1%
ā 0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
ā 0%Running Back1%
ā 43%Gull (selected)3%
ā 100%Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%Mike Lewis60%
ā 100%Joni Balter60%
ā 100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Representativeness Heurisā€¦Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos