Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gregry Van Beek results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 550 hits. Analysis detected 4,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,678 of 37,536 keywords). This Gregry Van Beek is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Gregry Van Beek
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
19%Gregry Van Beek (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos