Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Propper results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 983 hits. Analysis detected 5,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,675 of 37,536 keywords). This Greg Propper is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Greg Propper
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Greg Propper (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 23.6%23.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.0%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos