Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 983 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Propper results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 983 hits . Analysis detected 5,633 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,675 of 37,536 keywords). This Greg Propper is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Greg Propper
Keyword details
Total words: 3,932
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.9% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 23.6% 23.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 25.0%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst