Keyword summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 1,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Landsman results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 491 hits . Analysis detected 3,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,243 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,899 of 37,326 keywords). This Greg Landsman is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Greg Landsman
Keyword details
Total words: 3,243
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst