Keyword summary
13% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greenpeace results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 4,351 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,516 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,524 of 37,536 keywords). This Greenpeace is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Greenpeace
Keyword details
Total words: 4,516
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst