Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green Agenda results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 2,034 hits . Analysis detected 12,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 85% (5,645 of 37,536 keywords). This Green Agenda is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Green Agenda
Keyword details
Total words: 5,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.0% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 36.9% 36.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 36.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst