Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video5,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greater Houston Coalition For Justice results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,460 hits. Analysis detected 3,592 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,226 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (36,990 of 37,536 keywords). This Greater Houston Coalition For Justice is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Greater Houston Coalition For Justice
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 17,226
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.5% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.0%0.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos