Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great White Sharks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Indoctrination, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 2,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,267 of 37,536 keywords). This Great White Sharks is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Great White Sharks
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
30%Great White Sharks (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos