Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great White Sharks results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 291 hits . Analysis detected 2,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,267 of 37,536 keywords). This Great White Sharks is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Great White Sharks
Keyword details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst