Keyword summary
84% 1 analyzed article/video 2,384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Powers results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 910 hits . Analysis detected 6,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,152 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,990 of 37,536 keywords). This Great Powers is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Great Powers
Keyword details
Total words: 7,152
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.7% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst