Keyword summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Technology results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 770 hits . Analysis detected 4,527 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 73% (9,420 of 34,673 keywords). This Government Technology is worse (more manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group. Government Technology
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.4% 22.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst