Keyword summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video796 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Spending Bill results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 53.9% saturation with 1,288 hits. Analysis detected 4,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (3,220 of 37,536 keywords). This Government Spending Bill is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Government Spending Bill
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,388
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

91% percentile
025507510091.4% percentile
7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 53.9%53.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 18.4%18.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 26.7%26.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 53.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos