Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,557 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gov Hochul results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 814 hits . Analysis detected 5,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,228 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (22,745 of 36,662 keywords). This Gov Hochul is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Gov Hochul
Keyword details
Total words: 6,228
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst