Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gordon Sinclair Award results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 324 hits . Analysis detected 2,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,134 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,167 of 36,874 keywords). This Gordon Sinclair Award is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group. Gordon Sinclair Award
Keyword details
Total words: 4,134
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.0% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst