Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,900 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gop Donor results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,034 hits. Analysis detected 6,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,163 of 37,536 keywords). This Gop Donor is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Gop Donor
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
9%Gop Donor (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,600
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos