Keyword summary
23% 1 analyzed article/video 278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Google Chat results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 134 hits . Analysis detected 859 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,864 of 37,536 keywords). This Google Chat is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Google Chat
Keyword details
Total words: 1,112
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst