Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Golden Visa Programs results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 3,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (14,383 of 36,097 keywords). This Golden Visa Programs is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Golden Visa Programs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠61%Golden Visa Programs (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos