Keyword summary
â 11% 1 analyzed article/video 569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Golden Tongues results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 165 hits . Analysis detected 1,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of â 50% (18,902 of 37,536 keywords). This Golden Tongues is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Golden Tongues
Keyword details
Total words: 2,276
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst