Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video3,157 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Golden Gate Ferry results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 428 hits. Analysis detected 3,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,471 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (36,789 of 37,536 keywords). This Golden Gate Ferry is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Golden Gate Ferry
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
2%Golden Gate Ferry (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,471
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos