Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Politics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 1,420 hits . Analysis detected 6,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,727 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,681 of 37,536 keywords). This Global Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Global Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 5,727
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NPR 84% 8/10/2025, 6:24:29 PM