Keyword summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Foreign Exchange Reserves results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 2,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (11,710 of 37,536 keywords). This Global Foreign Exchange Reserves is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Global Foreign Exchange Reserves
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,064
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.7%9.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos