Keyword summary
24%2 analyzed articles/videos1,807 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glen Hansard results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 560 hits. Analysis detected 2,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,228 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 17% (47,223 of 56,886 keywords). This Glen Hansard is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Glen Hansard
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
17%Glen Hansard (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,228
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos