Keyword summary
â 9% 1 analyzed article/video 581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Girard College results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Indoctrination , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 179 hits . Analysis detected 731 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of â 28% (39,717 of 54,887 keywords). This Girard College is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Girard College
Keyword details
Total words: 2,324
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Attempt to Sell a Product⌠Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst