Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Get The Good Stuff results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anchoring Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 2,827 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,293 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Get The Good Stuff is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Get The Good Stuff
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Get The Good Stuff (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,293
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos