Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Georgetown Peace Scholar results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 601 hits. Analysis detected 2,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Georgetown Peace Scholar is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Georgetown Peace Scholar
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.2%19.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos