Keyword summary
86%1 analyzed article/video533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genocide In Gaza results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 372 hits. Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 83% (8,813 of 49,962 keywords). This Genocide In Gaza is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Genocide In Gaza
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
83%Genocide In Gaza (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos