Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Generation Three results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,015 hits. Analysis detected 6,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,409 of 37,536 keywords). This Generation Three is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Generation Three
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
30%Generation Three (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.9%10.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate