Keyword summary
45%2 analyzed articles/videos1,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Discrimination results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 5,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,603 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (13,742 of 35,464 keywords). This Gender Discrimination is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Gender Discrimination
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
62%Gender Discrimination (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,603
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos