Keyword summary
65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gay Couple results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 1,046 hits. Analysis detected 6,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,226 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,536 of 34,426 keywords). This Gay Couple is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Gay Couple
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
61%Gay Couple (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,226
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 20.0%20.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.6%8.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate