Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gawker results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,213 hits . Analysis detected 7,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Gawker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Gawker
Keyword details
Total words: 8,096
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst