Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gavin Newsom Redistricting results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,513 hits. Analysis detected 11,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,398 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Gavin Newsom Redistricting is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gavin Newsom Redistricting
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 13,398
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos