Keyword summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video1,602 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gavin & Stacey results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 399 hits. Analysis detected 3,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,806 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (29,102 of 37,536 keywords). This Gavin & Stacey is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Gavin & Stacey
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠23%Gavin & Stacey (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,806
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510022.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos