Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary Pierson results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 43.6% saturation with 1,334 hits . Analysis detected 7,125 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,775 of 37,536 keywords). This Gary Pierson is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Gary Pierson
Keyword details
Total words: 3,060
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.3% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 38.5% 38.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 43.6% 43.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 43.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 38.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst