Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gander Newfoundland results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 1,882 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Gander Newfoundland is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gander Newfoundland
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Gander Newfoundland (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,748
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos