Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gala In The Garden results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 543 hits. Analysis detected 2,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,619 of 37,536 keywords). This Gala In The Garden is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Gala In The Garden
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
80%Gala In The Garden (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 22.1%22.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos