Keyword summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Furloughs results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 2,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,453 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (24,598 of 37,536 keywords). This Furloughs is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group.
Furloughs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠35%Furloughs (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,453
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510034.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos