Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fulton And Elliott Chelsea results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 291 hits . Analysis detected 2,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,658 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Fulton And Elliott Chelsea is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fulton And Elliott Chelsea
Keyword details
Total words: 2,658
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst