Keyword summary
90%1 analyzed article/video323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Full House results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 615 hits. Analysis detected 2,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,816 of 36,204 keywords). This Full House is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Full House
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
87%Full House (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

87% percentile
025507510086.7% percentile
6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 47.6%47.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 23.9%23.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 47.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos