Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fuel Shortages results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 474 hits . Analysis detected 3,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,194 of 37,536 keywords). This Fuel Shortages is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Fuel Shortages
Keyword details
Total words: 3,752
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst