Keyword summary
50%1 analyzed article/video455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fuel Branding results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,671 of 36,916 keywords). This Fuel Branding is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Fuel Branding
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
69%Fuel Branding (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,820
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.3%5.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos