Keyword summary
50% 1 analyzed article/video 455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fuel Branding results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 173 hits . Analysis detected 1,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,671 of 36,916 keywords). This Fuel Branding is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Fuel Branding
Keyword details
Total words: 1,820
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.4% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst