Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,471 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frida Kahlo results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 718 hits . Analysis detected 6,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,336 of 36,885 keywords). This Frida Kahlo is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group. Frida Kahlo
Keyword details
Total words: 11,584
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst