Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Free Lunch Kansas City results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 2,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,872 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,560 keywords). This Free Lunch Kansas City is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Free Lunch Kansas City
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Free Lunch Kansas City (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,872
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos