Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fredericksburg results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 592 hits . Analysis detected 2,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,523 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,406 keywords). This Fredericksburg is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fredericksburg
Keyword details
Total words: 2,523
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.5% 23.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst