Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fran Hoepfner results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 367 hits . Analysis detected 3,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,487 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,785 of 37,536 keywords). This Fran Hoepfner is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Fran Hoepfner
Keyword details
Total words: 2,487
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst