Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 364 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fostering The Future Act results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.9% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 1,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,630 of 35,766 keywords). This Fostering The Future Act is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Fostering The Future Act
Keyword details
Total words: 1,456
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.9% percentile 7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 32.9% 32.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 32.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst