Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fort Mose results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hindsight Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This Fort Mose is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fort Mose
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Fort Mose (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,384
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos