Keyword summary
71% 2 analyzed articles/videos 620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forgery results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 436 hits . Analysis detected 3,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,825 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,990 of 37,536 keywords). This Forgery is better (less manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group. Forgery
Keyword details
Total words: 3,825
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst